Chapter 2.2: Taking quanta seriously


In 1905 Albert Einstein used the idea of quanta to explain the photoelectric effect, which was first described (and patented) by Nikola Tesla (1856 – 1943). The photoelectric effect occurs when light shines on a (usually) metal plate and electrons are ejected, creating a current. It was known that there is a relationship between the wavelength of the light used, the type of metal the plate is made of, and whether or not electrons were ejected. It turns out that there is a threshold wavelength of light, which is characteristic for the metal used, below which no electrons are ejected. Let us assume that light comes in the form of particles, known as photons, that also have a wavelength and frequency (we know: this doesn’t make sense, but bear with us for now). The intensity of the light is related to the number of photons that pass by us per second, while the energy per photon is dependent upon its frequency (or wavelength, since wavelength and frequency of light are related by the formula λν = c, where c, the speed of light in a vacuum, is a constant and equal to ~3.0 x 108 m/s).

 

2.1 Electrons & Orbitals
2.2 Quanta
2.3 Spectroscopy
2.4 Beyond Bohr
2.5 Periodic table
2.6 Orbitals plus
2.7 Quantum numbers


The higher the frequency ν (cycles per second, or Hertz) the shorter the wavelength λ (length per cycle), and the greater the energy per photon. Since wavelength and frequency are inversely related (as one goes up the other goes down), so energy is directly related to frequency by the relationship E = hν or inversely related to the wavelength E= hc/λ, where h is Planck’s constant. So radiation with a very short wavelength, such as X-rays (λ= ~10-10 m) and ultraviolet light (between 10-7 to 10-8 m) have much more energy per particle than long wavelength radiation like radio and microwaves (λ= ~103 m). This is why we don’t mind being surrounded by radio waves essentially all the time yet we closely guard our exposure to gamma-rays, X-rays and UV light; their much higher energies cause all kinds of problems with our chemistry, as we will see later.

Because of the relationship between energy and wavelength, you can shine light of long wavelength (low energy - such as infrared light) but high intensity (many photons per second) on a metal plate and no electrons will be released. But shine low intensity (few photons per second), high energy, short wavelength light, such as ultraviolet light or X-rays, on the plate and electrons are ejected. Once the wavelength is short enough to eject electrons, increasing the intensity of the light increases the number of electrons emitted. An analogy is with a vending machine that can only recognize quarters, you could put many nickels or dimes into the machine all day and nothing will come out. The surprising result is that the same total amount of energy can produce very different effects. Einstein explained this observation by assuming that only photons with “enough” energy could eject an electron from an atom; if photons with less energy hit the atom, no matter how many, no electrons are ejected58. Enough energy for what, you might ask, and the answer is that the lower energy photons simply do not have enough energy to overcome the attraction between an electron and the nucleus. Recall that, in the photoelectric effect, each photon ejects an electron from an atom on the surface of the metal. The electrons are somewhere in the atom (we have not yet specified where), but it takes energy to remove them, and the energy is used to overcome the attraction of the negative electron and the positive nucleus.

Now you should be really confused (a normal reaction)! On one hand we were fairly convinced that light acted as a wave, but now we see some of its behaviors can be best explained in terms of particles. This dual nature of light is conceptually difficult for most (normal) people because it is completely counterintuitive. In our macroscopic (normal) world things are either particles (bullets, balls, coconuts) or waves (in water), they are not, no not ever, both. As we will see, electromagnetic radiation is not the only example of something that has the properties of both a wave and a particle (or wave-particle duality as it is known) - electrons, protons, and neutrons also display wave-like properties. In fact, all matter has a wavelength, defined by Louis de Broglie (1892-1987) by the equation λ = h/mν, where mv is the object’s momentum and h is Planck’s constant (again).

For heavy objects, moving a slow speeds, the wavelength is very (very) small, but it does become a significant factor for light objects moving fast, like electrons. While light and electrons can act as both waves and as particles, it is “really” better to refer to them as quantum mechanical particles, which captures all features of their behavior and reminds us that they are weird! Their behavior will be determined by the context in which they are studied.

 

2.1 Electrons & Orbitals
2.2 Quanta
2.3 Spectroscopy
2.4 Beyond Bohr
2.5 Periodic table
2.6 Orbitals plus
2.7 Quantum numbers


Question to answer:

  • If the intensity of a beam of light is related to the number of photons passing per second, how would you explain intensity using the model of light as a wave? What would change, what would stay the same?
  • Draw a picture of what you imagine is happening during the photoelectric effect.
  • Is the energy required to eject an electron the same for every metal?
  • What would be the wavelength of the world record holder for the 100m sprint?

Questions to ponder:

  • Can you think of other scientific ideas that you find non-sensical (be honest now)?
  • How does the idea of an electron as a wave fit with your mental image of an atom?
  • Where is the electron if it is a wave?

Question for later :
  • Why do we not worry about being constantly bombarded by radiowaves (we are), but yet we guard our exposure to X rays?
  • What trends might you expect in the energies required to eject an electron?
  • Why do you think this phenomenon (the photoelectric effect) is most often seen with metals?
  • What property of metals is being exploited here?
  • What other kinds of materials might produce a similar effect?

27-Jun-2012